Study Techniques That
Actually Work
Based on the landmark 2013 study by Dunlosky et al., reviewing decades of learning research.
High-Impact Techniques
These methods are supported by strong research evidence
Practice Testing
High effectivenessQuiz yourself or take practice tests on material you're trying to learn
Retrieval strengthens memory more than re-studying
Create flashcards, do practice problems, use self-quizzing apps
Distributed Practice
High effectivenessSpread your studying over multiple sessions rather than cramming
Spacing forces retrieval from long-term memory, strengthening it
Study in short sessions across days/weeks, not marathon sessions
Interleaved Practice
Moderate-High effectivenessMix different topics or problem types during a study session
Forces discrimination between concepts, builds flexible knowledge
Shuffle problem types rather than practicing one type at a time
Elaborative Interrogation
Moderate effectivenessAsk yourself 'why' and 'how' questions about the material
Creates connections between new and existing knowledge
For each fact, ask 'Why is this true?' and try to explain it
Self-Explanation
Moderate effectivenessExplain material to yourself as you study it
Activates deeper processing and identifies gaps in understanding
After reading a section, explain the main ideas in your own words
What Doesn't Work (Despite Popularity)
These common techniques have weak research support
How Cruxly Implements These Techniques
Knowing about effective techniques is one thing. Actually using them consistently is another. Cruxly builds the science in so you don't have to think about it:
- ✓Practice testing — Every interaction is a quiz, not passive review
- ✓Distributed practice — Spaced repetition schedules optimal review times
- ✓Interleaved practice — Questions from different topics are mixed
You just photo your notes and start studying. The science happens automatically.
FAQ
What makes a study technique 'evidence-based'?
It's been tested in controlled research studies, ideally across different subjects, age groups, and settings. The techniques listed here have decades of research support.
Why don't schools teach these methods?
Great question. Despite strong evidence, these techniques aren't widely taught. Most students learn ineffective methods (highlighting, re-reading) and never discover what actually works.
Can I combine multiple techniques?
You should combine them. Practice testing + distributed practice is especially powerful. Cruxly combines testing, spacing, and interleaving automatically.
How long until I see results?
You'll notice improved recall within 1-2 weeks. Long-term retention benefits build over months. The key is consistency—these techniques compound over time.